3. Residual variability
or Within-subject variability (WSV) model
WSV
(also called as intra-individual variability) includes intra-individual
error, measurement error and any model misspecification error.
In
order to choose the correct appropriate residual error model,
it is essential to understand the concepts of weighting. Consider
a typical calibration curve for an analytical method with three
standards (1, 10 and 100 ng/mL). The standard deviations (determined
using say 3 samples) of these concentrations could be similar
or dependent on the concentrations. If the standard deviation
is constant (see Figure 1 below) the variance is considered homoscedastic.
However, if it is not then the variance is considered heteroscedastic
(Figure 2). For HPLC methods, generally, the standard deviation
is proportional to the sample concentration.
Figure
1
Figure
2
If we
consider plotting the standard deviation against the mean concentration
from figure 1, it would result in a line similar to the flat
line shown in Figure 3 below. Similarly when the
heteroscedastic standard deviations from figure 2 are plotted against
means, the plot will look like the inclined
line as in figure below. The flat line represents
the additive or constant
error component. The slope of the inclined line would be equal to
the coefficient of variation. Therefore, when the error is proportional
to the concentration, such an error model is called a constant
coefficient of variation error model or proportional
error model.
Figure
3
Based on the above mentioned
concepts, four different types of residual error models are described
below.
- If
the variance is assumed to be constant for all observations, then
the weights are typically set to a constant value, usually 1.
Such an error model is called an additive
or constant error model. An additive error model
is written as
yij
= ymij + εij
where
yij = observed concentration in indiviual i at time
j
ymij= model (m) predicted concentrations in individual
i at time j
εij = independant, identically distributed
statistical errors with ~N(0,σ2)
- Sample
analyses in PK studies are normally performed using HPLC or LC-MS-MS
techniques. With such analytical methods, it is observed that
the precision often changes with concentrations. The experimental
errors are considered to be heteroscedastic and can be written
as:
A constant
coefficient of variation (CCV) model or a proportional
model
yij
= ymij •(1 + εij)
Another
way of writing a CCV model is the exponential
error model (approximates constant coefficient
of variation)
yij
= ymij •exp(εij)
- In
the case of PK concentrations, where wide range of concentrations
are measured, the error in measurement based on the analytical
method is usually a combination of additive and proportional or
exponential error. Use of a combined
error model would improve predictions
at lower limit of assay precision where variance may be assumed
a constant and a proportional error model at higher concentration
range.
A combined
error model can be written as
yij
= ymij + ymij •ε1+
ε2
or
yij = ymij•exp(ε1)+
ε2
In population analysis,
-
a proportional error model could be used when the range of concentration
covers more than one order of magnitude
-
an additive error model could be used when the range of concentrations
are narrow